Compliance – Auvene works behind the scenes with fund managers, investors and institutions

GP LP Structure | How Funds Are Legally Built

The GP LP structure looks simple from a distance, one party manages, the other invests, but the legal architecture underneath it is what actually protects everyone involved.

Learn what the GP LP structure actually is, what belongs inside the limited partnership agreement that governs it, how governance rights and protections are typically negotiated, what side letters are used for, and how the GP LP structure gets applied across different fund types and jurisdictions.

What the GP LP Structure Actually Is

The GP LP structure is the legal foundation underneath the vast majority of private equity, venture capital, private credit, and real estate funds. GP stands for General Partner, the party responsible for managing the fund. LP stands for Limited Partner, the investors who contribute capital but do not participate in day to day management. The structure is built as a limited partnership, a legal form specifically designed to let one party manage actively while shielding the other from both operational involvement and, importantly, personal liability beyond their committed capital.

What makes the GP LP structure durable is not just this basic division of labour, but the detailed legal document that sits behind it, defining exactly how authority, risk, and economics are allocated between the two sides.

The Limited Partnership Agreement, The Document That Actually Runs the Fund

Every GP LP structure is governed by a limited partnership agreement, generally referred to as the LPA, and this document is where the real substance of the structure lives. The LPA typically sets out the fund’s investment strategy and restrictions, the GP’s authority and limits on that authority, the management fee and carried interest terms, the distribution waterfall, key person provisions, and the circumstances under which LPs can remove or replace the GP. Two funds can look identical on the surface, both organised as a GP LP structure, both raising from similar investors, and still differ enormously in practice depending entirely on what their respective LPAs actually say.

Core Elements Every GP LP Structure Includes

Capital Commitments, Not Upfront Capital

LPs in a GP LP structure typically commit capital rather than fund it immediately, with the GP calling capital in stages as investment opportunities arise, a mechanism known as a capital call or drawdown.

The Distribution Waterfall

The waterfall sets out the order in which proceeds from a successful investment are distributed, usually returning LP capital and a preferred return first, before the GP begins receiving carried interest on the fund’s profits.

Key Person Provisions

Many LPAs include a key person clause, allowing the fund’s investment period to pause or investor consent to be required if a named senior individual at the GP departs or becomes unable to perform their role.

Removal and Termination Rights

A GP LP structure typically defines specific circumstances, often fraud, gross negligence, or a supermajority LP vote, under which the GP can be removed or the fund terminated early, giving LPs a defined mechanism rather than no recourse at all.

The Limited Partner Advisory Committee

Most funds organised under a GP LP structure form a Limited Partner Advisory Committee, generally referred to as the LPAC, made up of a subset of larger or founding LPs. The LPAC is typically consulted on conflicts of interest, valuation matters, and any proposed amendments to the fund’s governing documents, giving a defined group of investors a structured voice in governance without handing management authority back to LPs generally, which would undermine the limited liability protection the structure is built around.

Side Letters, Where Individual Terms Get Negotiated

Alongside the main LPA, individual LPs frequently negotiate side letters, separate agreements that grant a specific investor additional rights or protections beyond what the standard LPA provides, most favoured nation clauses, additional reporting rights, or bespoke fee arrangements for a large anchor investor. Side letters allow a GP LP structure to remain standardised at its core while still accommodating the specific requirements of major institutional investors who may have their own internal policy constraints.

A structural nuance worth knowing. Most well drafted GP LP structures include a most favoured nation provision, giving LPs visibility into whether more favourable side letter terms have been granted to other investors, and in many cases the right to elect into those same terms.

How the GP LP Structure Applies Across Fund Types and Jurisdictions

Fund Type	How the GP LP Structure Is Typically Used
Private equity	Closed ended structure with a defined investment and harvest period
Venture capital	Similar closed ended structure, often with a longer extension provision given illiquid holding periods
Real estate	Often structured with additional co-investment or joint venture arrangements alongside the core LPA
Private credit	May include more frequent distribution mechanics given the income generating nature of the underlying assets

The GP LP structure itself can be formed in a range of jurisdictions, with the Cayman Islands exempted limited partnership remaining one of the most widely used vehicles globally, alongside Singapore’s own limited partnership regime for managers building an Asia based fund platform. The core legal mechanics stay broadly consistent across jurisdictions, though specific statutory defaults and filing requirements differ, which is why the choice of jurisdiction still matters even once the GP LP structure itself has been settled on.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can an LP lose their seat on the LPAC?

Typically yes, if their commitment falls below a threshold set out in the LPA, or if the fund’s governing documents otherwise define specific conditions for LPAC membership that a previously qualifying LP no longer meets.

Is a side letter legally binding in the same way as the LPA?

Yes, a properly executed side letter is a binding legal agreement, though it generally supplements rather than overrides the core terms of the LPA, and well drafted structures make clear how any conflict between the two should be resolved.

Does every GP LP structure include a key person clause?

Most institutional quality funds do, since investors typically want some protection tied to the departure of the specific individuals whose track record influenced their decision to commit capital in the first place.

Structuring Your Next GP LP Fund

Auvene Operating Partners supports fund managers with structuring, administration, and corporate secretarial services for GP LP structures across Singapore and Cayman, from initial formation through to ongoing investor and regulatory reporting.

This article is for general information only and does not constitute legal, tax, or investment advice. Fund terms and jurisdictional requirements vary considerably, and managers should seek advice from us or a qualified legal and tax counsel before structuring a fund.

Why strong governance and compliance has become a genuine competitive advantage for asset managers, and what actually belongs inside a governance and compliance framework that regulators and investors will trust.

What Governance and Compliance Actually Covers

Governance and compliance is often treated as a single phrase, but it really describes two connected disciplines working together. Governance is the structure of decision making, accountability, and oversight inside an organisation. Compliance is the discipline of meeting the specific legal and regulatory obligations that apply to that organisation’s activities. A fund manager or corporate service provider with strong governance and compliance has both pieces working in tandem, clear decision making structures on one side, and disciplined adherence to AML CFT, KYC, and regulatory reporting obligations on the other.

For asset managers and corporate service providers, governance and compliance is not a back office formality. Institutional investors now treat it as a core part of due diligence before allocating capital, and regulators treat weak governance and compliance as a leading indicator of where future problems are most likely to surface.

AML CFT, The Foundation of Financial Sector Compliance

Anti money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism, generally shortened to AML CFT, sits at the core of almost every compliance framework in financial services. The obligation is straightforward in principle, financial institutions must take active steps to prevent their services being used to launder money or finance illegal activity, but the practical requirements are detailed and jurisdiction specific.

In Singapore, AML CFT obligations for licensed fund managers and fund administrators are set out under the Securities and Futures Act, while in the Cayman Islands similar obligations flow from the Proceeds of Crime Act, the Anti Money Laundering Regulations, and guidance issued by the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority. Common elements across most jurisdictions include customer due diligence, screening against sanctions and politically exposed persons lists, ongoing transaction monitoring, and a clear obligation to file a suspicious activity report when something does not look right.

KYC and Due Diligence, Knowing Exactly Who You Are Dealing With

Know your customer, or KYC, and due diligence together form the practical mechanism through which AML CFT obligations get carried out on the ground. Before onboarding an investor, a client, or a counterparty, a fund manager or service provider needs to verify identity, understand the source of funds and source of wealth, and assess the overall risk profile of the relationship before it begins.

Standard Due Diligence

Applied to lower risk relationships, standard due diligence typically covers identity verification, basic screening, and confirmation of the nature of the business relationship.

Enhanced Due Diligence

Higher risk relationships, including politically exposed persons, complex ownership structures, or clients connected to higher risk jurisdictions, require enhanced due diligence, involving deeper investigation into source of wealth, beneficial ownership, and the underlying purpose of the relationship.

Good KYC and due diligence is not a one time gate at onboarding. It is the foundation that everything else in a governance and compliance programme is built on, since a poorly understood client relationship at the start tends to create far bigger problems later.

Governance Frameworks, Structuring Decision Making and Accountability

A governance framework sets out who is responsible for what, how decisions get made, and how oversight actually functions inside an organisation. For a fund manager, this typically includes a defined board or management structure, clear delegation of authority, an independent compliance function with a genuine ability to escalate concerns, and regular reporting lines up to senior management and, where relevant, the board itself.

A governance framework that exists only on paper, with no real authority behind it, tends to fail exactly when it matters most. Strong governance gives the compliance function enough independence and seniority to actually flag and resolve problems, rather than being overridden by commercial pressure.

Policies and Procedures, Turning Principles Into Practice

Policies and procedures translate a governance framework and a set of regulatory obligations into instructions that staff can actually follow day to day. A strong set of policies and procedures typically covers onboarding and KYC steps, transaction monitoring thresholds, escalation paths for suspicious activity, conflicts of interest, data protection, and a clear record keeping standard for every decision made along the way.

A common weakness. Many organisations have detailed policies and procedures that look complete on paper but are rarely followed consistently in practice. Regulators increasingly test not just whether a policy exists, but whether staff can demonstrate they actually follow it.

Ongoing Monitoring, Why Compliance Does Not End at Onboarding

Ongoing monitoring is the part of governance and compliance most likely to be underinvested, precisely because its value is less visible than a well documented onboarding file. A client or investor who looked low risk at onboarding can become higher risk over time, through a change in circumstances, a new business interest, or a shift in political exposure. Ongoing monitoring means periodically refreshing due diligence, screening for changes against sanctions and PEP lists, and monitoring transaction patterns for anything inconsistent with what would normally be expected of that relationship.

Regulators consistently identify weak ongoing monitoring as one of the most common gaps in otherwise reasonable compliance programmes, precisely because it requires sustained attention long after the excitement of onboarding a new relationship has passed.

Building a Governance and Compliance Function That Actually Works

The organisations that get governance and compliance right tend to share a few common traits. They treat compliance as a genuine business function with real authority, not an afterthought bolted onto operations. They invest in properly trained people rather than relying purely on software to catch every issue. And they review their governance framework, policies and procedures, and monitoring processes regularly, rather than treating them as fixed once written.

FAQ

Is AML CFT the same requirement in every jurisdiction?

The underlying principles are broadly consistent internationally, largely shaped by standards set by the Financial Action Task Force, but the specific rules, thresholds, and reporting obligations vary by jurisdiction, which is why a compliance framework built for one market cannot simply be copied into another without review.

How often should due diligence be refreshed for an existing client?

This depends on the client’s risk rating, with higher risk relationships generally reviewed more frequently than standard risk ones, but every governance and compliance framework should define a clear refresh cycle rather than leaving it to judgment alone.

Can governance and compliance be fully outsourced?

Much of the operational work, including KYC processing and ongoing monitoring, can be outsourced to an experienced administrator or compliance specialist, but ultimate accountability for governance and compliance generally remains with the licensed entity itself, regardless of who performs the underlying work.

Strengthening Your Governance and Compliance Framework

Auvene Operating Partners supports MAS licensed asset managers and corporate structures with AML CFT compliance, KYC and due diligence, governance frameworks, policies and procedures, and ongoing monitoring across Singapore and Cayman.

This article is for general information only and does not constitute legal, tax, or regulatory advice. AML CFT and compliance requirements vary by jurisdiction and are updated periodically, so organizations should confirm current obligations with us or seek qualified legal and compliance advisors.